Share article:
For years, SMS has been Australia’s go-to messaging channel. It’s quick, reliable, and built into every phone. But times are changing.
As data coverage improves and app-based messaging becomes second nature, WhatsApp is quietly carving out a bigger share of how Australians connect.
For businesses, this creates an interesting crossroads.
Should you stick with SMS (a.k.a. the “old faithful” that reaches everyone) or start exploring WhatsApp?
In this article, we’ll break down WhatsApp vs SMS in Australia, exploring how each channel works, how Aussies are using them, and what’s best for different business use cases.
As of June 2025, there are 13 million active WhatsApp users in Australia.
It’s harder to pin down a definitive percentage of Australians using SMS because SMS is baked into every mobile plan. That said, it’s still extremely relevant. 96% of Australians say they use their mobile phones to send messages (SMS or equivalent) on a daily basis.
When it comes to who are the keenest messagers in Australia, younger adults come out on top. Those between 18-24 are the heaviest users of messaging apps (we’re talking 89%), but older groups are catching up. About 79% of 55-64 year-olds use apps for messaging and calls.
It also makes sense that WhatsApp is much more common in metropolitan and urban areas. In fact, 76% of people use a messaging app in metro areas compared to around 70% inrural spots.
At first glance, both WhatsApp and SMS do the same thing, but under the hood, they work very differently.
WhatsApp runs on internet data, while SMS relies on the mobile network.
That means WhatsApp messages can be sent anywhere there’s Wi-Fi or mobile data, but SMS will deliver even when someone’s offline or in a no-signal area.
Here’s a breakdown of the core differences between the two.
| SMS | ||
| Tech | Relies on internet or cellular data. | Relies on cellular network / mobile carrier infrastructure. |
| Reach and accessibility | Users need to have WhatsApp installed and have an active internet connection | Works on any mobile phone, no data or app needed |
Cost for businesses | Generally “per message template” or session pricing under WhatsApp Business API (replies within a 24-hour window are often free) | Charged per text (or per segment) by carrier or gateway. Each outbound SMS has a cost, and there may be costs on inbound SMS depending on setup |
| Delivery speed and reliability | Very fast when a user is online. Deliver and read receipt available, but delivery depends on internet connectivity | Generally fast and reliable, though impacted by cellular network issues |
| User experience | Rich features, including media (images, video, audio), documents, voice notes, group chats, read receipts, interactive buttons, catalogues, chatbots and automation support | Plain text (160 characters per segment), limited to basic two-way replies, any media tends to need MMS (which adds cost, less reliable) |
| Brand and trust signals | Verified business profiles, branded templates, and the ability to show up as a business identity in the chat interface | Limited branding, usually just the number or sender ID and text content |
| Scalability and automation | Can power bots, flows, auto-responses, segmentation, triggers, and two-way conversational journeys. Platform integrations offer more options. | Automation is available but more basic, including scheduled SMS and auto-replies. Platform integrations (like HubSpot) offer more options. |
Not exactly, but SMS is more resilient in the face of weak data. WhatsApp message delivery and “read” status depend on internet access. SMS, being independent of data, often gets through when app messages don’t.
In many conversational use cases, yes. Because WhatsApp’s pricing often allows free replies within a 24-hour service window, the back-and-forth costs can be lower than paying for multiple SMS exchanges. But for one-way blasts or simple notifications, SMS might still be competitive depending on volume and local pricing.
WhatsApp easily handles media (images, videos, documents) in messages. SMS can’t do that natively. To send media you’d need MMS or a link, both of which come with their own constraints.
Absolutely. Many businesses use a “waterfall” or fallback approach: try WhatsApp first (for its richer experience), and if that fails, send via SMS to make sure the message gets delivered.
If you’re trying to choose between SMS or WhatsApp for customer engagement, it helps to think of them not as rivals, but as different tools for different jobs.
Here’s a breakdown of each channel’s strengths, as well as when one might be better than the other.
Let’s be clear here, this isn’t a case of “this or that”.
You don’t always have to pick one. In fact, a hybrid or fallback approach often makes the most sense. The key is knowing when each channel is most appropriate.
Use SMS when:
Use WhatsApp when:
Many businesses take what’s called a “waterfall” approach.
This is basically when they try to reach people via WhatsApp first (because it provides a better experience), and if that fails, they fallback to SMS to make sure the message gets delivered. This is kind of a “best of both worlds” model that works well if you want to balance engagement with also getting your message across.
Yes, features and cost are important, but as a business, staying compliant is equally as critical.
Both WhatsApp and SMS take very different approaches to privacy and security, which has its pros and cons under Aussie law.
WhatsApp privacy & security
WhatsApp offers end-to-end encryption, which means only the two people involved in the message can see the content (not even Meta can get a peek). This means it’s more secure for sensitive conversations than SMS which has no encryption at all.
That said, WhatsApp does collect metadata (like who you message, when, and how often), which isn’t encrypted. There’s also a bit of a back-and-forth in Australia at the moment about how encrypted platforms actually fit with national data-retention and lawful access rules under the Telecommunications Act.
So, while WhatsApp’s content security is strong, businesses should still be aware of how data is stored and accessed.
SMS, on the other hand, is reliable but less secure.
SMS privacy & security
Messages are sent (unencrypted) via mobile networks, so they’re at risk of being intercepted or spoofed. Spam texts and phishing (or “smishing”, as it’s been dubbed) are on the rise, which has prompted the ACMA to tighten up regulations. There’s a new rule coming into play this Dec off the back of this that will mark any messages sent from unregistered sender IDs as unverified.
Finally, any businesses using SMS for marketing must comply with the Spam Act 2003 and Privacy Act 1988, which means you need to get clear consent, identify yourself, and make it easy to opt-out.
Most businesses either use a messaging API or gateway that supports both WhatsApp and SMS, or they integrate the relevant APIs into a CRM or customer engagement platform. That way, your team can manage conversations (and campaigns) all from the same place.
But not all providers are created equal.
Here’s what to consider:
This is where Sinch MessageMedia comes into play.
You get a single platform that supports SMS, WhatsApp, and more, so you can manage both channels in one place. As well as being Australian through-and-through (we know all about Aussie messaging laws and regulations), you can run WhatsApp campaigns, deliver transactional alerts via SMS, and handle support convos through the same inbox.
With Sinch MessageMedia, you don’t have to choose between the reliability and universal access of SMS and the engagement power of WhatsApp. You can have both.
Sinch MessageMedia’s messaging platform includes:
Book a demo to see how it works or start a free trial and start connecting with your customers today.